Download

KIDNEY CANCER: ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Avoidable Benign Kidney Tumor Resections—Data from a Tertiary Care Cancer Institute

Arun Ramdas Menon1*, Vivek Patel1, Nivedita Suresh2, Anand Raja1

1Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India;

2Department of Onco-Pathology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India

Abstract

Enhancing renal masses are conventionally treated as malignant unless proven otherwise due to the difficulty distinguishing between malignant and benign tumors based on imaging. Data from the Western registries suggests overtreatment of renal tumors with a Benign Kidney Tumor Resection Rate (BKTRR) ranging from 10 to 33%, with an increasing trend. Since robust, population-based data from India was unavailable, we sought to determine BKTRR in an apex cancer institute, which would provide insight into the rates in the community. The institutional kidney tumor database was queried for all patients aged ≥18 years with renal neoplasms between January 2000 and December 2022. Patients who underwent surgery, either radical or partial nephrectomy, with intent to cure were analyzed and the BKTRR during the study period was evaluated. A total of 330 patients underwent surgery for renal tumors presumed to be malignant. A final pathologic diagnosis of the benign tumor was made in 16 (4.8%) patients, comprising 7.2, 7.2, and 3.7% of resections with LTD ≤4, 4–7, and >7 cm, respectively. Asymptomatic benign tumors ≤7 cm comprised 3.0% of all resections, and these were potentially unnecessary surgeries. A multivariable analysis suggested that no patient or imaging characteristic could predict a final benign extirpative pathology. Our study suggests a lower rate of BKTRR compared to the published international literature but is likely to be the lower limit of that in the community. Population-based studies are required to determine the true BKTRR and the quantum of potentially unnecessary surgeries for benign kidney tumors.

Key words: benign kidney tumor, kidney cancer, nephrectomy, overtreatment, renal tumor

Received: 16 June 2024; Accepted after revision: 1 September 2024; Published: 1 October 2024

Author for correspondence: Anand Raja, Cancer Institute (WIA), Department of Surgical Oncology, No: 38, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai–600036, India. Email: [email protected]

How to cite: Menon AR., et al. Avoidable Benign Kidney Tumor Resections—Data from a Tertiary Care Cancer Institute. J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2024; 11(4): 1–9.

DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i4.286

Copyright: Menon AR., et al.
License: This open access article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Introduction

All enhancing renal masses are conventionally considered malignant unless proven otherwise and are treated as such, usually with extirpative surgery or ablation. This stems from the inherent difficulty in distinguishing malignant versus benign tumors based on imaging (1).

Consequent to this approach, data from the Western surgical series suggests an overtreatment of renal tumors with a Benign Kidney Tumor Resection Rate (BKTRR) ranging from 10 to 33% (25). An increasing trend of BKTRR has also been reported, which has been attributed to increased detection of renal masses due to the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging (3, 4). The surge in adoption of robotic surgery has also fueled more aggressive treatment of small renal masses (SRMs), 20–30% of which are benign (6).

Surgery for an asymptomatic benign renal tumor constitutes an unnecessary surgical procedure that has negative impacts on both the patient as well as the healthcare system (7, 8). However, there is a lack of population database studies on BKTRR in the Indian healthcare scenario, and extrapolating Western data may be inaccurate due to intrinsic epidemiological differences in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in India compared to the West (9).

Our institution is an apex cancer center in South India, with a patient base comprising referrals from other hospitals due to tumor complexity and anticipated difficult surgery. We hypothesized that due to the aforementioned significant referral bias, our benign kidney tumor resection rate must be low.

Methods

This work was conducted at the Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.

After obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board, the prospectively maintained institutional kidney tumor database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients aged ≥18 years, who presented with renal neoplasms between January 2000 and December 2022. Pertinent clinicopathologic data was abstracted, including stage at presentation, management elected, and pathologic outcomes. Patients who underwent surgery, either radical or partial nephrectomy, with the intent to cure were analyzed and the BKTRR during the study period was evaluated.

Statistical analyses were conducted in SAS v9.4 (Cary, NC) at a significance level of 0.05. Patient and tumor characteristics were described using mean, median, and interquartile ranges (IQR) for continuous variables, and frequencies for categorical variables. Pathologic classification and staging were based on the World Health Organization Classification of Renal Tumors (10) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (11), respectively. Comparisons between benign and malignant extirpative pathology were made using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables. Multivariable Cox regression models were generated to evaluate the association between benign pathology, patient, and tumor characteristics.

Overall, the study aims to provide insight into the BKTRR in the Indian healthcare scenario and the potential impact of referral bias on the data.

Results

Of the 464 renal tumors treated at our institute over the study period, 117 (25.2%) presented with histologically proven metastatic disease (20.5%) or with inoperable disease (4.7%) and were excluded from the analysis. Furthermore, 17 (3.7%) patients did not undergo surgery due to poor performance status or patient refusal. No patient in our registry underwent active surveillance or ablation.

A total of 330 patients underwent surgery for renal tumors, presumed to be malignant, with intent to cure; and 282 of these were radical nephrectomies and 48 were partial nephrectomies (Table 1).

Table 1: Patient and tumor characteristics.

Total
(N = 330)
Benign
(N = 16)
Malignant
(N = 314)
P
Age, years;
median, mean (IQR)
54.0
(52.8, 45.0–61.0)
53.0
(51.2, 45.5–55.0)
54.5
(52.9, 18.0–84.0)
0.588
Gender, n (%)
  Male 186 (56.4) 6 (37.5) 180 (57.3) 0.119
  Female 144 (43.6) 10 (62.5) 134 (42.7)
Laterality, n (%)
  Right 168 (50.9) 6 (37.5) 162 (51.6) 0.502
  Left 160 (48.5) 10 (62.5) 150 (47.8)
  Bilateral 2 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 2 (0.6)
Presentation, n (%)
  Asymptomatic 91 (27.6) 7 (43.8) 84 (26.8) 0.137
  Symptomatic 239 (72.4) 9 (56.3) 230 (73.2)
  Abdominal pain 133 (40.3) 6 (37.5) 127 (40.4) 0.253
  Hematuria 105 (31.8) 1 (6.3) 104 (33.1)
  Mass abdomen 14 (4.2) 1 (6.3) 13 (4.1)
  Weight loss/fatigue 20 (6.1) 0 (0.0) 20 (6.4)
LTD, cm; median, mean (IQR) 7.0 (8.1, 4.5–10.0) 5.3 (8.2, 3.9–11.1) 7.0 (8.1, 4.5–10.0) 0.608
Procedure, n (%)
  Radical nephrectomy 282 (85.5) 13 (81.3) 269 (86.7) 0.624
  Partial nephrectomy 48 (14.5) 3 (18.8) 45 (14.3)

IQR, interquartile range; LTD, longest tumor diameter.

The median (mean, IQR) patient age was 54.0 years (52.8, 45.0–61.0), and 43.6% were females. 27.6% of patients had incidentally diagnosed tumors. The median (mean, IQR) longest tumor diameter (LTD) was 7.0 cm (8.1, 4.5–10.0).

A final pathologic diagnosis of benign tumor was made in 16 (4.8%) patients. Benign tumors comprised 7.2, 7.2, and 3.7% of resections with LTD ≤4, 4–7, and >7 cm (Table 2). Asymptomatic benign tumors ≤7 cm comprised 3.0% of all resections. Five (31.3%) benign tumors had LTD >10 cm.

Table 2: Distribution of tumors based on size and pathologic stage.

LTD (cm);
n (%)
Total
(n = 330)
Benign
(n = 16)
Malignant
(n = 314)
<2.0 9 (2.7) 0 (0.0) 9 (2.9)
2.1–3.0 21 (6.4) 2 (12.5) 19 (6.1)
3.1–4.0 39 (11.8) 3 (18.8) 36 (11.5)
≤ 4.0 69 (20.9) 5 (31.3) 64 (20.4)
4.1–5.0 39 (11.8) 3 (18.8) 36 (11.5)
5.1–6.0 29 (8.8) 1 (6.3) 28 (8.9)
6.1–7.0 30 (9.1) 1 (6.3) 0 (0.0)
4.1 to ≤7 98 (29.7) 5 (31.3) 93 (29.6)
7.1–8.0 32 (9.7) 0 (0.0) 32 (10.2)
8.1–9.0 26 (7.9) 0 (0.0) 26 (8.3)
9.1–10.0 23 (7.0) 1 (6.3) 22 (7.0)
7.110 81 (24.5) 1 (6.3) 80 (25.5)
>10.0 80 (24.2) 5 (31.3) 75 (23.9)
NA 2 (0.6) 2 (0.6)
Pathologic T Stage; n (%)
pT1a 59 (17.9) 59 (18.8)
pT1b 86 (26.1) 86 (27.4)
pT2a 55 (16.7) 55 (17.5)
pT2b 27 (8.2) 27 (8.6)
pT3a 50 (15.2) 50 (15.9)
pT3b 18 (5.5) 18 (5.7)
pT3c 5 (1.5) 5 (1.6)
pT4 11 (3.3) 11 (3.5)
NA 3 (0.9) 3 (1.0)

LTD, longest tumor diameter; NA, not available.

Angiomyolipomas (AMLs) and renal oncocytomas (ROs) were the most common, accounting for 37.5 and 31.2% of all resected benign tumors. Other benign lesions accounted for 31.2% (Table 3).

Table 3: Clinicopathologic features of all resected benign tumors.

No Year of Surgery Age (years) Sex Presentation LTD (cm) Laterality Pathology RN/PN
1 2003 65 Male Incidental 5.5 Right Oncocytoma RN
2 2003 38 Female Abdominal pain 9.5 Left Angiomyolipoma RN
3 2004 55 Female Abdominal pain 5.0 Right Adrenocortical hyperplasia with adrenal hemangioma RN
4 2005 55 Female Incidental 3.5 Left Oncocytoma RN
5 2005 74 Female Abdominal pain 13.0 Left Angiomyolipoma RN
6 2005 49 Female Abdominal pain 5.0 Right Oncocytoma RN
7 2007 37 Female Abdominal pain 15.0 Left Leiomyoma RN
8 2007 54 Male Incidental 3.0 Left Lipoma PN
9 2011 35 Male Abdominal pain 4.0 Right Angiomyolipoma PN
10 2011 49 Male Incidental 5.0 Left Angiomyolipoma RN
11 2011 52 Female Incidental 20.0 Left Oncocytoma RN
12 2015 55 Female Incidental 3.4 Right Pyelonephritis RN
13 2019 57 Female Incidental 7.0 Right Oncocytoma RN
14 2022 54 Male Hematuria 10.5 Left Angiomyolipoma RN
15 2022 46 Male Mass abdomen 20.0 Left Cystic nephroma RN
16 2022 44 Female Incidental 2.2 Left Angiomyolipoma PN

LTD, longest tumor diameter; PN, partial nephrectomy; RN, radical nephrectomy.

Of the 314 patients with malignant renal tumors, the median (mean, IQR) LTD was 7.0 (8.1, 4.5–10.0), and 113 (35.3%) of them had stage ≥ pT2b.

No significant trend was noted in the rate of benign resections per year (mean/range [%] = 3.3/0–15.8; Figure 1).

Figure 1: Trend in benign resections over the 23-year study period. Graph depiction of the number of benign (red) and malignant (blue) resected kidney tumors per year during the 23-year study period.

On multivariable analysis, we did not identify any significant patient or imaging characteristic that could predict a final extirpative pathology of a benign kidney tumor (Table S1).

Discussion

In the absence of robust population-based data from India, our study evaluated the BKTRR in an apex cancer institute and attempted to gauge the quantum of potentially avoidable benign kidney tumor resections. Our BKTRR of 4.8% is lower than that reported in the Western series, where benign resections account for 15–30% of all resected tumors (24). Rates of 4.4–11% have been reported from other Asian countries (1214). In our series, asymptomatic benign tumors ≤7 cm accounted for 3% of the overall resections, and these may potentially have been unnecessary surgeries. A significant proportion of patients presenting with symptoms, rather than an incidental diagnosis, larger median tumor size of resected tumors, with over a third of patients presenting with ≥ pT2b disease, and considerable patients presenting with inoperable or metastatic disease reflect our significant referral bias, and attribute to the lower BKTRR.

Surgery for an asymptomatic, benign renal tumor is of concern due to its adverse consequences on both the patient and the healthcare system (7). The surgical morbidity of a radical or partial nephrectomy is not trivial, with reported complication rates of 14 and 20%, respectively (15). Clavien Dindo Grade 3–4 complications in 2.5–6% (15, 16) and perioperative mortality rates of 0.5–1% in 200 patients have been reported (15, 17), with one study indicating a greater risk with benign tumors (8). The consequences of nephrectomy on decreasing overall renal function, with long-term adverse effects on cardiovascular health and longevity, have been well reported (18).

Johnson et al. reported an 82% increase in nephrectomies for benign lesions between 2000 and 2009, with an estimated annual 6000 unnecessary nephrectomies for benign tumors (2). The annual cost of managing benign tumors in the United States has been estimated to be in the region of 153 million dollars (8). Data from India is sparse and limited to small single institutional series. Additionally, costs related to surgery are difficult to estimate due to heterogenicity in healthcare systems; however, the public health magnitude of this intuitively seems high. Avoiding unnecessary surgery can alleviate overburdened healthcare systems, and spare patients the associated financial toxicity.

Benign resection rates from Japan, South Korea, and China have been reported to be between 4.4 and 11% (1214). The lower rates have been attributed to lower incidence of oncocytomas, variations in extirpative pathology evaluation and reporting, particularly of oncocytic tumors, less intense use of cross-sectional imaging, and more liberal use of repeat or advanced imaging in characterizing indeterminate lesions (1, 2, 13).

The association of size and likelihood of benign pathology has been a matter of controversy with conflicting evidence in the literature (3, 4). Although our rates of benign pathology decreased with increasing tumor size, this was not statistically significant. Interestingly in our series, no tumor <2 cm was benign. Additionally, 3.7% of tumors >7 cm were benign, and five benign tumors were >10 cm. This is likely to be a result of our referral bias as more complex, and larger tumors are likely to have been referred to our institution due to anticipated surgical difficulties.

We did not find any statistically significant difference in patients or tumor imaging characteristics among benign and malignant renal tumors, likely due to our relatively small cohort, and skewed referral patterns. The multivariable analysis did not identify any analyzed patient or tumor characteristic that could predict benign histology. Other authors have variably reported female gender, asymptomatic presentation, smaller size, low tumor complexity or nephrometry score, lower body mass index (BMI), and lower serum creatinine to be associated with benign pathology (5, 13, 14, 1923). These parameters are likely predictive for benign tumors only in their respective study cohorts, and may not be generalizable. In addition, although they may help in counseling a patient regarding the likelihood of benign resection, they are not useful to conclusively establish a benign diagnosis preoperatively. Lane et al. developed a nomogram, using patient age, CT size, local symptoms at diagnosis, and history of smoking, with reported bootstrap-corrected concordance index of 0.644 (22), which has been analogized to being marginally better than a coin toss in predicting benign tumors (20).

Angiomyolipomas and ROs accounted for two-thirds of our benign resections. We believe that the attempts to reduce benign resection should primarily be directed at nonextirpative diagnosis of these lesions, particularly when the renal mass under investigation demonstrates no obvious malignant features on imaging, such as infiltration of pelvicalyceal system, vessels, or sinus or perinephric fat.

Historically, a renal mass biopsy was not favored due to its invasive nature and fear of complications related to hemorrhage from the kidney or tumor and needle-tract seedling (24, 25). Other concerns were high nondiagnostic rates and sampling error due to tumor heterogeneity (24, 26). Contemporary data indicates a positive predictive value of 99.8%, nondiagnostic rates of 14%, complication rate of <5%, and exceedingly rare occurrence of needle-tract seeding (25, 27). Few other organs are removed without a biopsy diagnosis of malignancy; yet in a survey of 1131 urologists, 32% stated that they would never perform a biopsy for an SRM with 68% reporting that performing a biopsy would not change management (28), indicating that widespread adoption in clinical management algorithms is unlikely soon.

Advanced imaging technologies hold great promise in the noninvasive characterization of renal tumors. Although classic AMLs can be diagnosed on CT or MRI using well-established criteria, 5% of AMLs are fat-poor and cannot be differentiated from RCC on conventional imaging (29, 30). The use of multiparametric MRI in differentiating these lesions has been reported to have a sensitivity and specificity of 83 and 93%, respectively (31).

Molecular imaging entails the use of a radiopharmaceutical directed at a specific target protein or cellular process in combination with conventional cross-sectional imaging. 99mTc-sestamibi accumulates in mitochondria, which are abundant in RO, and sparse in RCC. 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT takes advantage of this property with a reported sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 95.2% for the diagnosis of RO and hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumors (32).

The use of an artificial intelligence (AI) platform to analyze radiomics from cross-sectional imaging studies has been recently investigated with encouraging results (33). Radiomic and clinical variables of interest analyzed using a machine learning predictive model could differentiate benign versus RCC with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.84. In their study cohort of 684 patients, the authors estimated that the number of unnecessary surgeries for benign tumors could have been reduced from 15 to 3.5% by the use of AI to complement clinical data.

A third of our benign resections were non-AML/RO lesions. Current imaging technology cannot distinguish these lesions, and the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous biopsy is unknown. With a nondiagnostic biopsy, particularly if the tumor is characterized as an SRM, active surveillance may be an option with delayed intervention for tumors that demonstrate growth (34, 35). In larger, symptomatic lesions or when a percutaneous biopsy indicates a tumor with uncertain malignant potential, an extirpative pathologic diagnosis is likely the safest option.

Our study is limited by its retrospective nature, with analysis based on data captured by our tumor registry. Not all desirable variables such as BMI, comorbidity, and nephrometry scores, among others, were recorded, hence were not available for analysis. Not all imaging studies were available for review. As mentioned earlier, our center, being an apex cancer institute, has distinctive referral patterns, hence our data may not be representative of data from other high-volume institutes or community.

Conclusions

Our institutional data suggests a lower BKTRR compared to the published international literature, with no increasing trend. It is important to note that despite our significant referral bias, we were not immune to inadvertent benign resections, and our rates are likely to represent the lower limit of benign resections in the community. Population-based studies are needed to estimate the true prevalence of potentially unnecessary surgeries for benign kidney tumors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

AI Declaration Statement

No Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools or technology was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

REFERENCES

1. Shin T, Duddalwar VA, Ukimura O, Matsugasumi T, Chen F, Ahmadi N, et al. Does computed tomography still have limitations to distinguish benign from malignant renal tumors for radiologists? Urol Int. 2017;99(2):229–36. 10.1159/000460303

2. Johnson DC, Vukina J, Smith AB, Meyer AM, Wheeler SB, Kuo TM, et al. Preoperatively misclassified, surgically removed benign renal masses: A systematic review of surgical series and United States population level burden estimate. J Urol. 2015;193(1):30–5. 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.102

3. Patel HD, Semerjian A, Gupta M, Pavlovich CP, Johnson MH, Gorin MA, et al. Surgical removal of renal tumors with low metastatic potential based on clinical radiographic size: A systematic review of the literature. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(8):519–24. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.05.013

4. Corcoran AT, Russo P, Lowrance WT, Asnis-Alibozek A, Libertino JA, Pryma DA, et al. A review of contemporary data on surgically resected renal masses—Benign or malignant? Urology. 2013;81(4):707–13. 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.009

5. Nandanan N, Veccia A, Antonelli A, Derweesh I, Mottrie A, Minervini A, et al. Outcomes and predictors of benign histology in patients undergoing robotic partial or radical nephrectomy for renal masses: A multicenter study. Cent European J Urol. 2020;73(1):33–8. 10.5173/ceju.2020.0019

6. Shah PH, Alom MA, Leibovich BC, Thompson RH, Uzzo RG, Kavoussi LR, et al. The temporal association of robotic surgical diffusion with overtreatment of the small renal mass. J Urol. 2018;200(5):981–8. 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.081

7. Sohlberg EM, Metzner TJ, Leppert JT. The harms of overdiagnosis and overtreatment in patients with small renal masses: A mini review. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(6):943–5. 10.1016/j.euf.2019.03.006

8. Nguyen KA, Brito J, Hsiang W, Nolte A, Syed JS, Suarez-Sarmiento A, et al. National trends and economic impact of surgical treatment for benign kidney tumors. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(3):183.e9–e15. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.11.019

9. Joshi A, Anand A, Prabhash K, Noronha V, Shrirangwar S, Bakshi G, et al. Kidney cancer demographics and outcome data from 2013 at a tertiary cancer hospital in India. Indian J Cancer. 2017;54(4):601–4. 10.4103/ijc.IJC_644_17

10. Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA, Reuter VE, Ulbright TM. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-Part A: Renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol. 2016;70(1):93–105. 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029

11. Amin MB, editor. AJCC cancer staging manual. Eighth edition/American Joint Committee on Cancer. New York, NY: Springer; 2017.

12. Soga N, Nishikawa K, Takaki H, Yamada Y, Arima K, Hayashi N, et al. Low incidence of benign lesions in resected suspicious renal masses greater than 2 cm: Single-center experience from Japan. Int J Urol. 2012;19(8):729–34. 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03030.x

13. Park SY, Jeon SS, Lee SY, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Lee HM, et al. Incidence and predictive factors of benign renal lesions in Korean patients with preoperative imaging diagnoses of renal cell carcinoma. J Korean Med Sci. 2011;26(3):360–4. 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.3.360

14. Xiong YH, Zhang ZL, Li YH, Liu ZW, Hou GL, Liu Q, et al. Benign pathological findings in 303 Chinese patients undergoing surgery for presumed localized renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol. 2010;17(6):517–21. 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02525.x

15. Lowrance WT, Yee DS, Savage C, Cronin AM, O’Brien MF, Donat SM, et al. Complications after radical and partial nephrectomy as a function of age. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1725–30. 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.101

16. Mari A, Campi R, Schiavina R, Amparore D, Antonelli A, Artibani W, et al. Nomogram for predicting the likelihood of postoperative surgical complications in patients treated with partial nephrectomy: A prospective multicentre observational study (the RECORd 2 project). BJU Int. 2019;124(1):93–102. 10.1111/bju.14680

17. Fernando A, Fowler S, Van Hemelrijck M, O’Brien T. Who is at risk of death from nephrectomy? An analysis of thirty-day mortality after 21 380 nephrectomies in 3 years of the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) National Nephrectomy Audit. BJU Int. 2017;120(3):358–64. 10.1111/bju.13842

18. Weight CJ, Larson BT, Fergany AF, Gao T, Lane BR, Campbell SC, et al. Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses. J Urol. 2010;183(4):1317–23. 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.030

19. Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Johnson MH, Sozio SM, Sharma R, Iyoha E, et al. Distinguishing malignant and benign renal masses with composite models and nomograms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinically localized renal masses suspicious for malignancy. Cancer. 2016;122(21):3267–76. 10.1002/cncr.30268

20. Kava BR, Eldefrawy A, Ayyathurai R, Manoharan M, Aziz M, Bird VG, et al. Impact of body mass index and tumor location on the incidence of benign histology at the time of nephron-sparing surgery. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44(5):1319–24. 10.1007/s11255-012-0207-z

21. Zisman A, Patard JJ, Raz O, Klatte T, Haifler M, Mendlovic S, et al. Sex, age, and surgeon decision on nephron-sparing surgery are independent predictors of renal masses with benign histologic findings—A multicenter survey. Urology. 2010;76(3): 541–6. 10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.089

22. Lane BR, Babineau D, Kattan MW, Novick AC, Gill IS, Zhou M, et al. A preoperative prognostic nomogram for solid enhancing renal tumors 7 cm or less amenable to partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2007;178(2):429–34. 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.106

23. Bauman TM, Potretzke AM, Wright AJ, Knight BA, Vetter JM, Figenshau RS. Partial nephrectomy for presumed renal-cell carcinoma: Incidence, predictors, and perioperative outcomes of benign lesions. J Endourol. 2017;31(4):412–7. 10.1089/end.2016.0667

24. Lane BR, Samplaski MK, Herts BR, Zhou M, Novick AC, Campbell SC. Renal mass biopsy—A renaissance? J Urol. 2008;179(1):20–7. 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.124

25. Renshaw AA, Powell A, Caso J, Gould EW. Needle track seeding in renal mass biopsies. Cancer Cytopathol. 2019;127(6): 358–61. 10.1002/cncy.22147

26. Dechet CB, Zincke H, Sebo TJ, King BF, LeRoy AJ, Farrow GM, et al. Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol. 2003;169(1):71–4. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64038-4

27. Patel HD, Johnson MH, Pierorazio PM, Sozio SM, Sharma R, Iyoha E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and risks of biopsy in the diagnosis of a renal mass suspicious for localized renal cell carcinoma: Systematic review of the literature. J Urol. 2016;195(5):1340–7. 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.029

28. Patel RM, Safiullah S, Okhunov Z, Meller D, Osann K, Kaler K, et al. Pretreatment diagnosis of the small renal mass: Status of renal biopsy in the United States of America. J Endourol. 2018;32(9):884–90. 10.1089/end.2018.0175

29. Simpfendorfer C, Herts BR, Motta-Ramirez GA, Lockwood DS, Zhou M, Leiber M, et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: Can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid diagnosis? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(2):438–43. 10.2214/AJR.08.1180

30. Park BK. Renal angiomyolipoma based on new classification: How to differentiate it from renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(3):582–8. 10.2214/AJR.18.20408

31. Wilson MP, Patel D, Murad MH, McInnes MDF, Katlariwala P, Low G. Diagnostic performance of MRI in the detection of renal lipid-poor angiomyolipomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2020;296(3):511–20. 10.1148/radiol.2020192070

32. Gorin MA, Rowe SP, Baras AS, Solnes LB, Ball MW, Pierorazio PM, et al. Prospective evaluation of (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for the diagnosis of renal oncocytomas and hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumors. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):413–6. 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.056

33. Nassiri N, Maas M, Cacciamani G, Varghese B, Hwang D, Lei X, et al. A Radiomic-based machine learning algorithm to reliably differentiate benign renal masses from renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(4):988–94. 10.1016/j.euf.2021.09.004

34. Menon AR, Hussein AA, Attwood KM, White T, James G, Xu B, et al. Active surveillance for risk stratification of all small renal masses lacking predefined clinical criteria for intervention. J Urol. 2021;206(2):229–39. 10.1097/JU.0000000000001714

35. Menon A, Aly A, White T, James G, May P, Kauffman E. Prevention of benign kidney tumor resection using a combination of routine biopsy and tumor: Cortex PEER evaluation. J Urol. 2019;201(Supplement 4):e188. 10.1097/01.JU.0000555302.69849.d1

Supplementary

Table S1: Multivariate analysis for benign resection.

Variable Odds ratio 95 % CI P
Year of surgery 0.921 0.841–1.008 0.075
Age 0.987 0.947–1.028 0.522
Sex (male vs female) 0.550 0.188–1.609 0.275
Laterality (right vs left) 0.564 0.193–1.651 0.296
Tumor size 1.024 0.905–1.159 0.707
Incidental vs symptomatic 0.530 0.163–1.724 0.291
Hematuria vs no hematuria 6.411 0.765–53.698 0.087
Partial vs Radical nephrectomy 0.697 0.152–3.196 0.642