Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Tumo

Main Article Content

Dan O’Neal
Tal Cohen
Cynthia Peterson
Richard G. Barr

Keywords

contrast-enhanced ultrasound, radiofrequency ablation, renal tumor ablation, small renal masses, ultrasound contrast agents

Abstract

Although only limited long-term studies evaluating thermal ablation of renal masses have been performed, it appears that thermal ablation has a comparable 5-year success rate to that of partial or total nephrectomy. This technique is often used in patients who are not good candidates for partial or total nephrectomy. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for characterization of focal liver lesions in adults and pediatric patients. CEUS can be used off label for renal applications and has been used for years in Europe and Asia. It has several advantages over contrast-enhanced computed tomography for use as the technique to guide and evaluate efficacy of thermal ablation of renal masses. These include the ability to visualize small amounts of enhancement, repeat dosing to evaluate efficacy of an ablation during a procedure, thin slice thickness, and real-time visualization. Ultrasound contrast is also non-nephrotoxic and non-hepatotoxic, allowing evaluation of patients with renal insufficiency. This article reviews the use of CEUS for the guidance and follow-up of thermal ablative procedures of renal masses.

Abstract 3357 | PDF Downloads 1698 HTML Downloads 5711 XML Downloads 1016

References

1. American Cancer Society. Kidney cancer (adult) – renal cell carcinoma [Internet]. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society 2018 [cited 2018 Jan 7]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/kidney-cancer.html
2. Atri M, Tabatabaeifar L, Jang HJ, Finelli A, Moshonov H, Jewett M. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced US for differentiating benign from malignant solid small renal masses. Radiology. 2015;276(3):900–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015140907
3. Bhan SN, Pautler SE, Shayegan B, Voss MD, Goeree RA, You JJ. Active surveillance, radiofrequency ablation, or cryoablation for the nonsurgical management of a small renal mass: A cost-utility analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(11):3675–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3028-0
4. Kong WT, Zhang WW, Guo HQ, Qiu JL, Tang M, Jiang ZM, et al. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography after radiofrequency ablation for renal cell carcinoma: Is it sufficient for assessment of therapeutic response? Abdom Imaging. 2011;36(3):342–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-010-9665-x
5. Sanchez K, Barr RG. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound detection and treatment guidance in a renal transplant patient with renal cell carcinoma. Ultrasound Q. 2009;25(4):171–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3181b4f9cf
6. Hoeffel C, Pousset M, Timsit MO, Elie C, Méjean A, Merran S, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of renal tumours: Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for early detection of residual tumour. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(8):1812–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1742-6
7. Boss A, Clasen S, Kuczyk M, Schick F, Pereira PL. Image-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(3):725–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0415-y
8. Johnson DB, Duchene DA, Taylor GD, Pearle MS, Cadeddu JA. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation of radiofrequency ablation of the kidney: Reliable imaging of the thermolesion. J Endourol. 2005;19(2):248–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.19.248
9. Meloni MF, Bertolotto M, Alberzoni C, Lazzaroni S, Filice C, Livraghi T, et al. Follow-up after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: Contrast-enhanced sonography versus contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(4):1233–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3238
10. Piscaglia F, Nolsøe C, Dietrich CF, Cosgrove DO, Gilja OH, Bachmann Nielsen M, et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33(1):33–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1281676
11. Cokkinos DD, Antypa EG, Skilakaki M, Kriketou D, Tavernaraki E, Piperopoulos PN. Contrast enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys: What is it capable of? Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:595873.
12. Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Cioffi V, Rossi A, Baratella E, Pizzolato R, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography with unenhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(4):1239–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3546
13. Malhi H, Grant EG, Duddalwar V. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver and kidney. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014;52(6):1177–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2014.07.005
14. Fetzer DT, Rafailidis V, Peterson C, Grant EG. Sidhu P, Barr RG. Artifacts in contrast-enhanced ultrasound: A pictorial essay. Abdom Radiol. 2017. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Dec 2. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1417-8. [Epub ahead of print]
15. Bell DJ, Gaillard F. Bosniak classification system of renal cystic masses [Internet]. [cited 2016 Sep 5]. Available from: https://radiopaedia.org/articles/bosniak-classification-system-of-renal-cystic-masses
16. Robbin ML, Lockhart ME, Barr RG. Renal imaging with ultrasound contrast: Current status. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41(5):963–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(03)00070-8
17. Barr RG, Peterson C, Hindi A. Evaluation of indeterminate renal masses with contrast-enhanced US: A diagnostic performance study. Radiology. 2014;271(1):133–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13130161
18. Barr RG. Is there a need to modify the Bosniak renal mass classification with the addition of contrast-enhanced sonography? J Ultrasound Med. 2017 May;36(5):865–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/ultra.16.06058
19. Lackey L 2nd, Peterson C, Barr RG. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors. Ultrasound Q. 2012;28(4):269–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0b013e318274de66
20. Plasencia Martínez JM. Pulmonary radiofrequency ablation (Part 1): Current state. Radiologia. 2015 Jul–Aug;57(4):275–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2014.12.009