Computed Tomography Imaging Characteristics of Histologically Confirmed Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma—Implications for Ancillary Imaging

Main Article Content

Jeffrey B. Walker
Justin Loloi
Alexander Birk
Jay D. Raman

Keywords

CT, histology, Hounsfield, kidney, papillary, RCC

Abstract

Low-attenuation renal lesions on non-contrast computed tomography (CT) are often considered to be benign cysts without need for further imaging. However, the papillary subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may have similar radiographic characteristics. A single-center retrospective review was therefore performed to identify extirpated papillary RCC (pRCC) specimens with correlation made to preoperative tumor imaging characteristics. A total of 108 pRCC specimens were identified of which 84 (27 type I, 17 type 2, 40 unspecified) had CT imaging available for review. Non-contrast CT was available for 73 tumors with 16 (22%) demonstrating Hounsfield units (HU) measurements fewer than 20 at baseline without differences between papillary subtypes. Mean attenuation following contrast administration was similar between papillary subtypes (45 HU for type 1 pRCC and 49 HU for type 2). This study highlights that pathologically proven pRCC is a heterogeneous entity in terms of density on preoperative CT imaging. A non-contrast CT scan with HU fewer than 20 may not be an adequate evaluation for incidental renal masses, as over 1 in 5 pRCCs demonstrate lower attenuation than this cutoff. Further study is needed to identify the appropriate role of ancillary imaging in the workup of seemingly benign-appearing renal lesions.

Abstract 1609 | PDF Downloads 770 HTML Downloads 453 XML Downloads 322

References

1. O'Connor SD, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Oliva MR, Silverman SG. Incidental finding of renal masses at unenhanced CT: Prevalence and analysis of features for guiding management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:139–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5920
2. Kang SK, Huang WC, Pandharipande PV, Chandarana H.Solid renal masses: What the numbers tell us. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:1196–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.12502
3. Pooler BD, Pickhardt PJ, O'Connor SD, Bruce RJ, Patel SR, Nakada SY. Renal cell carcinoma: Attenuation values on unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:1115–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7587
4. Egbert ND, Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Davenport MS, Fran-cis IR, Kunju LP, et al. Differentiation of papillary renal cell carcinoma subtypes on CT and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:347–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9451
5. Egbert ND, Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Davenport MS, Fran-cis IR, Kunju LP, et al. Differentiation of papillary renal cell carcinoma subtypes on CT and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:347–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9451
6. Klatte T, Pantuck AJ, Said JW, Seligson DB, Rao NP, LaRochelle JC, et al. Cytogenetic and molecular tumor profiling for type 1 and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:1162–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1229
7. Pignot G, Elie C, Conquy S, Vieillefond A, Flam T, Zerbib M, et al. Survival analysis of 130 patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: Prognostic utility of type 1 and type 2 subclassification. Urology. 2007;69:230–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.052
8. Delahunt B, Eble JN, McCredie MR, Bethwaite PB, Stewart JH, Bilous AM. Morphologic typing of papillary renal cell carcinoma: Comparison of growth kinetics and patient survival in 66 cases. Hum Pathol. 2001;32:590–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2001.24984
9. Krishna S, Murray CA, McInnes MD, Chatelain R, Siddaiah M, Al-Dandan O, et al. CT imaging of solid renal masses: Pit-falls and solutions. Clin Radiol. 2017;72:708–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.05.003
10. Herts BR, Coll DM, Novick AC, Obuchowski N, Linnell G, Wirth SL, et al. Enhancement characteristics of papillary renal neoplasms revealed on triphasic helical CT of the kidneys. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:367–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.178.2.1780367
11. Dilauro M, Quon M, McInnes MD, Vakili M, Chung A, Flood TA, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced multiphase renal protocol CT versus MRI for diagnosis of papillary renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:319–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.14932
12. Schieda N, Vakili M, Dilauro M, Hodgdon T, Flood TA, Shabana WM. Solid renal cell carcinoma measuring water attenuation (-10 to 20 HU) on unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:1215–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.14554
13. Prasad SR, Humphrey PA, Catena JR, Narra VR, Srigley JR, Cortez AD, et al. Common and uncommon histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma: Imaging spectrum with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2006;26:1795–806;discussion 1806–710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.266065010
14. Vikram R, Ng CS, Tamboli P, Tannir NM, Jonasch E, Matin SF, et al. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: Radiologic-pathologic correlation and spectrum of disease. Radiographics. 2009;29:741–54;discussion 755–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.293085190
15. Yamada T, Endo M, Tsuboi M, Matsuhashi T, Takase K, Hi-gano S, et al. Differentiation of pathologic subtypes of papillary renal cell carcinoma on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1559–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3181
16. Sankineni S, Brown A, Cieciera M, Choyke PL, Turkbey B. Imaging of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2016;34:147–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.05.020
17. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® [Internet]. [cited 2019 Dec 15]. Available from: http://www.acr.org/ac
18. Gurel S, Narra V, Elsayes KM, Siegel CL, Chen ZE, Brown JJ. Subtypes of renal cell carcinoma: MRI and pathological features. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013;19:304–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/dir.2013.147
19. Chiarello MA, Mali RD, Kang SK. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detection of papillary renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211:812–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.19462